North Carolina
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
546  Jeremy Brown SO 32:56
662  Logan Carroll JR 33:07
928  Mark Myers SO 33:32
1,006  Matt Thornton SO 33:39
1,068  Mitch Resor FR 33:43
1,476  Jake McEneaney FR 34:17
1,585  Brodie Modini FR 34:26
2,132  Luke Peterson FR 35:23
2,247  Carl Geiger SR 35:40
National Rank #139 of 315
Southeast Region Rank #19 of 48
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 15th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.1%
Top 20 in Regional 97.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Jeremy Brown Logan Carroll Mark Myers Matt Thornton Mitch Resor Jake McEneaney Brodie Modini Luke Peterson Carl Geiger
Louisville Classic (Gold) 09/30 1092 32:48 33:05 33:26 33:32 33:38 34:17 34:19 36:02
Penn State National Open 10/13 1127 33:07 33:55 33:23 33:14 33:43 34:19 34:14 35:27 35:40
ACC Championship 10/27 1114 32:55 33:14 33:42 33:41 33:40 33:32 34:13 34:44
Southeast Region Championships 11/10 1084 32:36 32:58 33:39 33:39 33:56 35:15 35:46





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 15.9 492 0.1 1.0 2.1 5.8 17.1 20.5 18.9 13.4 9.5 5.5 3.4 2.1 0.7 0.3



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Jeremy Brown 66.9
Logan Carroll 80.0
Mark Myers 104.8
Matt Thornton 111.7
Mitch Resor 115.0
Jake McEneaney 148.6
Brodie Modini 155.3




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 0.1% 0.1 10
11 1.0% 1.0 11
12 2.1% 2.1 12
13 5.8% 5.8 13
14 17.1% 17.1 14
15 20.5% 20.5 15
16 18.9% 18.9 16
17 13.4% 13.4 17
18 9.5% 9.5 18
19 5.5% 5.5 19
20 3.4% 3.4 20
21 2.1% 2.1 21
22 0.7% 0.7 22
23 0.3% 0.3 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0